United Kingdom the independent: exposing the United States against Iran Insider _ longkaifeng

3 February, from the International Atomic Energy Agency in the non-aligned movement and the Group of 77 countries visited Iran's uranium conversion facility in Isfahan. Accompanied visit of Iran in International Atomic Energy Agency on behalf of soltaniyeh representatives to visit that day also illustrates the International Atomic Energy Agency in the Department of the factory's core facility installation of surveillance cameras. Xinhua/ by new Xinhua Wangzhuangao: United Kingdom the independent site recently published a signed article exactly from the United States against Iran, there is no reason for United States Iran military combat, the risks faced by the United States is what aspects views, article entitled "the big problem: the United States are really want to attack Iran, or intimidation in force?". At the moment the United States on Iran accusing Iran on Iraq involved so-called Shiite militants. Washington claims that Iran is funding, armed them. United States also opposes the so-called Syria and Iran on Lebanon's Hezbollah. United States on these issues behind Iran accusing also conceal a greater unease: the failure of the United States in Iraq is making Iran become major beneficiaries; Iran's growing influence, must at all costs, eliminate this uncertainty. Background, there are two. First, the United States feared that Iran is taking advantage of illegal nuclear power programme to cover the development of nuclear weapons. Second, the 1979 hostage crisis made deep resentment, when the revolutionary guards to attack the United States Embassy in Teheran, the 52 United States citizens hostage as long as 15 months. Although since then, both sides occasionally make some gestures, but still not resumed diplomatic relations. Anti-Western of Iran Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2005 was elected President of the two countries realize the hopes of reconciliation. Against Iran are only verbally? is it is not. In addition to speech, the United States also to the Persian Gulf to send two military battle group display. United States plan to Iraq troop surge 2.1 million has also been some as initial action, ready to Iraq as a base to attack Iran's nuclear facilities, or joint attacks. Some people believe that the United States more troops for Iraq Iran in growing influence. United States officials, to some extent confirmed this, saying that they retain attacks Iran target in Iraq. Now they are on the United Kingdom and other European allies. Washington aggressive expression, coupled with Tehran leadership position, all of which manufacture a restless atmosphere, one or the other party may over-react. United States on the territory of Iraq Iran target to launch any attack, are likely to upgrade to larger confrontation. It is not difficult to imagine a scenario in which Iran us cross-border pursuit; an event leading to another event. There is no diplomatic relations between the two countries is a hassle because the talks were conducted through intermediaries, and prone to misunderstandings. United States at this stage of the route is not an attack on Iran in the territory. If Bush ordered the use of force, bets may be larger than in Iraq. The worst case scenario is: United States caught another costly and very likely unwinnable war to extremes; Iran's courage to speed up the implementation of the nuclear programme, the United States had to bring regional hegemony to Iran. United States there is no reason to carry on Iran? military strikes that there are grounds for is: * Iran blatant contempt for International Atomic Energy Agency and the United Nations, clearly did not meet their international legal obligations ; * Iran to acquire nuclear weapons would destroy stability in a region (the situation in the region have highly unstable), other countries acquisition of nuclear weapons; * Iran has unique Islamic militant, the United States, on the broader Western interests are threatened, should be subject to constraints. See no reason is: * as the nuclear non-proliferation Treaty signatory, Iran has the right to develop nuclear energy, and Iran denies plans to nuclear weapons; * Iran in Iraq has legitimate security and strategic interests, have the right to protected; * take a look at the United States in Iraq for unilateral intervention of catastrophic consequences.